Branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management Records, 1897-2005, bulk 1987-2002
Branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management records, 1897-2005, bulk 1987-2002
Collection context
Summary
- Creators:
- Sequoia National Park (Calif.). Division of Forestry and Vegetation Management
- Abstract:
- Records generated within the organizational divisions of Sequoia Kings Canyon National Park concerning the branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management.
- Extent:
- 13 linear feet
- Language:
- Languages represented in the collection: English
- Preferred citation:
-
Branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management records, SEKI 22368. Courtesy of the National Park Service, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks.
Background
- Scope and content:
-
Overall, the collection is organized by various operational groups within the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch and individual files contain a full range of record types. Such record types include: correspondence, reports, planning documents, proposals, evaluations, contracts, guides, manuals, field data, surveys, accomplishments, expenditures, photographs, negatives, and slides. Important topics contained within this collection are the restoration of Giant Forest, hazard tree mitigation, and forest health projects, such as dwarf mistletoe and white pine blister rust.
- Biographical / historical:
-
Sequoia and Kings Canyon were the second and fourth national parks to be established by the federal government, in 1890 and 1940 respectively. The park’s superintendent began dealing with the intricacies of park resource management by the 1930s. Sequoia National Park, under the direction of park superintendent John R. White, was one of the first parks to face issues associated with the collective effects of development and visitation on the park ecosystems. The federal government established Kings Canyon National Park as a separate park from Sequoia, but for the bulk of its history, it has been administered jointly.
Originally the park services were split into three divisions: administration, maintenance, and rangers. Rangers were trained how to do just about everything; their responsibilities were very general. Then in the later half of the 20th century the park service began refining the ranger division by pulling off groups of people with increasingly specialized and professionalized skills into separate divisions. Interpretation and resource management were two such divisions spun off from the ranger division. It was not until 1976 that work functions drawn from throughout the park’s administration were consolidated to officially establish the Division of Natural Resources Management, including the Branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management.
In 1926, the major fire that broke out in Glacier National Park inspired the park service to create a forestry office, which was “the first formal organizational designation specifically for natural resource management” (Sellars 1997, 83). Given that Sequoia National Park was created to protect a species of trees, forestry has been an important aspect of park operations. The primary functions of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch are supervising tree crews in cutting down hazard trees, coordinating timber sales, managing forest health projects, such as the attempted eradication of dwarf mistletoe and white pine blister rust, supervising soil and moisture crews in the preservation of meadows and the management of grazing, coordinating crews in the construction and maintenance of fences, and supporting revegetation and restoration projects.
The records amassed here were collected by Thomas E. Warner. Tom Warner has worked as the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park forester since the late 1970s. The forestry program has waxed and waned over the years, and with it, Tom Warner’s responsibilities have fluctuated. The Forestry Division has continued to grow since the first park forester was hired, but the principle responsibilities have remained mostly intact.
Major projects included in this collection are the restoration of Giant Forest, hazard tree mitigation, and forest health projects, such as dwarf mistletoe and white pine bister rust.
- Acquisition information:
- The collection came from the files of Tom Warner, the park forester for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park, and covers the years 1897–2005 with the bulk of the files dating from 1987–2002.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into VII Series: Series I Branch Wide Correspondence and Reports; Series II Vegetation Management; Series III Hazard Tree Mitigation; Series IV Forest Health; Series V Timber Sales; Series VI Meadow Preservation; and Series VII Photographs, Negatives, Slides and Aerial Photos.
- Physical location:
- Sequoia Kings Canyon National Parks. Ash Mountain Headquarters, Archive.
- Rules or conventions:
- Finding aid prepared using Describing Archives: a Content Standard
Indexed terms
- Subjects:
- Vegetation management
Forestry management
Timber sales - Names:
- Sequoia National Park (Calif.). Branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management
Access and use
- Restrictions:
-
Collection is open for research by appointment.
- Terms of access:
-
Many collections are former federal government records and are in the public domain. Other collections are from private sources; copyright has been transferred to the NPS on most. Some collections have publication restrictions. Staff will assist researchers in determining copyright status of selected materials. Researchers are required to properly credit all materials used. The researcher assumes responsibility for acquiring copyright permissions when needed.
- Preferred citation:
-
Branch of Forestry and Vegetation Management records, SEKI 22368. Courtesy of the National Park Service, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks.
- Location of this collection:
-
47050 Generals HighwayThree Rivers, CA 93271, US
- Contact:
- (559) 565-3133
Branch Wide Correspondence and Reports, 1950-2002, bulk 1987-1995
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of correspondence and reports pertaining to all functions of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch. These files could not be separated out into more specific series because they address too many disparate activities of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is organized into two subseries: Subseries A, Correspondence; and Subseries B, Plans and Reports.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of correspondence and reports pertaining to all functions of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch. These files could not be separated out into more specific series because they address too many disparate activities of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is organized into two subseries: Subseries A, Correspondence; and Subseries B, Plans and Reports.
Correspondence, 1984-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of correspondence addressing all aspects of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch. The last two files contain Tom Warner’s phone logs.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries is separated into two sections: correspondence and phone logs. Each category is arranged chronologically.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of correspondence addressing all aspects of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch. The last two files contain Tom Warner’s phone logs.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries is separated into two sections: correspondence and phone logs. Each category is arranged chronologically.
Plans and Reports, 1950-2001
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of annual forestry reports, evaluations, accomplishment reports, and project plans.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of annual forestry reports, evaluations, accomplishment reports, and project plans.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Vegetation Management, 1963-2003, bulk 1968-2002
- Scope and content:
-
One of the Forestry Branch’s principle functions was to undertake ecological restoration. From 1947 – 1972 there was a revolutionary change in priorities of management in the national parks. Science became the leading voice, replacing landscape architecture as the new motivator. This both stemmed from and caused the park’s reappraisal of resource management. The priority became ecosystem preservation and moved away from visitor use. In Giant Forest, visitor use was taking a toll on the big trees, causing rapid deterioration of the delicate sequoia ecosystem. These large resource threats and issues came into question and heated debates began. Giant Forest had been a major concession site, with over 400 structures, and many did not believe that visitors would be satisfied if the concessioners were removed. Studies of the negative impacts of development and visitor use on vegetation within national parks date back to the 1920s. Despite these studies, development within the parks continued. In the 1950s, there were breakthrough scientific studies done on sequoia trees finding that buildings, sewage and power lines, roads and human compaction of soil harms the big trees’ root systems. The only recommendation was to remove the paths and structures. Superintendent John Davis called a conference in 1960 to discuss this evidence and decide on the best path forward. They decided that commercial activity and concessions would be moved to Lodgepole and that Giant Forest should be allowed to recover. The question of perhaps relocating all overnight lodging in Giant Forest was again brought up but undecided. The passing of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 by Congress required the evaluation of all major federal actions and their environmental consequences mitigated. The National Park Service produced a Development Concept Plan (DCP) for Giant Forest. The DCP called for significant reductions in the development of Giant Forest. The plan called for a full removal of all overnight visitor facilities from the grove. New lodging was to be built at Clover Creek as a substitute. Implementation of the plan began in the early 1980s. The park forester and park ecologists were fundamental in the implementation of the long planned restoration of Giant Forest. Restoring this grove of giant sequoias to as near its natural state as possible involved the demolition of buildings in the area, the relocation of concession facilities, and the construction of new buildings at Clover Creek.
The series consists of broad vegetation management plans and reports, records pertaining to specific restoration projects within the park, files concerning vegetation mapping and sensitive plant projects, and a small section relating to research on Sequoia trees.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is organized into four subseries: Subseries A, Plans and Reports; Subseries B, Restoration Projects; Subseries C, Vegetation Mapping and Sensitive Plant Projects; and Subseries D, Sequoia Research.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
One of the Forestry Branch’s principle functions was to undertake ecological restoration. From 1947 – 1972 there was a revolutionary change in priorities of management in the national parks. Science became the leading voice, replacing landscape architecture as the new motivator. This both stemmed from and caused the park’s reappraisal of resource management. The priority became ecosystem preservation and moved away from visitor use. In Giant Forest, visitor use was taking a toll on the big trees, causing rapid deterioration of the delicate sequoia ecosystem. These large resource threats and issues came into question and heated debates began. Giant Forest had been a major concession site, with over 400 structures, and many did not believe that visitors would be satisfied if the concessioners were removed. Studies of the negative impacts of development and visitor use on vegetation within national parks date back to the 1920s. Despite these studies, development within the parks continued. In the 1950s, there were breakthrough scientific studies done on sequoia trees finding that buildings, sewage and power lines, roads and human compaction of soil harms the big trees’ root systems. The only recommendation was to remove the paths and structures. Superintendent John Davis called a conference in 1960 to discuss this evidence and decide on the best path forward. They decided that commercial activity and concessions would be moved to Lodgepole and that Giant Forest should be allowed to recover. The question of perhaps relocating all overnight lodging in Giant Forest was again brought up but undecided. The passing of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 by Congress required the evaluation of all major federal actions and their environmental consequences mitigated. The National Park Service produced a Development Concept Plan (DCP) for Giant Forest. The DCP called for significant reductions in the development of Giant Forest. The plan called for a full removal of all overnight visitor facilities from the grove. New lodging was to be built at Clover Creek as a substitute. Implementation of the plan began in the early 1980s. The park forester and park ecologists were fundamental in the implementation of the long planned restoration of Giant Forest. Restoring this grove of giant sequoias to as near its natural state as possible involved the demolition of buildings in the area, the relocation of concession facilities, and the construction of new buildings at Clover Creek.
The series consists of broad vegetation management plans and reports, records pertaining to specific restoration projects within the park, files concerning vegetation mapping and sensitive plant projects, and a small section relating to research on Sequoia trees.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is organized into four subseries: Subseries A, Plans and Reports; Subseries B, Restoration Projects; Subseries C, Vegetation Mapping and Sensitive Plant Projects; and Subseries D, Sequoia Research.
Plans and Reports, 1970-1999
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of general vegetation management operations guides, reports and accomplishments, revegetation plans and programs, drafts of plans, funding plans, and vegetation workshops. There are also a few files on the work that the Youth Conservation Corp (YCC) participated in during the mid 1980s.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of general vegetation management operations guides, reports and accomplishments, revegetation plans and programs, drafts of plans, funding plans, and vegetation workshops. There are also a few files on the work that the Youth Conservation Corp (YCC) participated in during the mid 1980s.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Restoration Projects, 1968-2003, bulk 1987-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of plans, projects, guidelines, data, photography, correspondence and memoranda corresponding to various specific restoration projects that took place within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The park records cover most comprehensively the restoration of Giant Forest, due to its high level of significance within the park. Other project locations include: the Ash Mountain nursery, Clover Creek, Dorst campground, Generals Highway, and Wuksachi Village. There are also various invasive species mitigation projects described in the records.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries begins with two folders of general revegetation management plans and charts, and then continues with specific projects associated with different geographic areas of the park arranged chronologically.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of plans, projects, guidelines, data, photography, correspondence and memoranda corresponding to various specific restoration projects that took place within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The park records cover most comprehensively the restoration of Giant Forest, due to its high level of significance within the park. Other project locations include: the Ash Mountain nursery, Clover Creek, Dorst campground, Generals Highway, and Wuksachi Village. There are also various invasive species mitigation projects described in the records.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries begins with two folders of general revegetation management plans and charts, and then continues with specific projects associated with different geographic areas of the park arranged chronologically.
Vegetation Mapping and Sensitive Plant Projects, 1968-1990
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of records and correspondence regarding vegetation type mapping projects throughout the park, records pertaining to the aerial photography project, which was done specifically to comprehensively map the park’s vegetation, and files containing sensitive plant monitoring data. Some of the species monitored are the Midget Milk-vetch Plant, the Purple Mountain Parsley Plant, the Pine Foot Plant, the Lupine Plant, etc.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of records and correspondence regarding vegetation type mapping projects throughout the park, records pertaining to the aerial photography project, which was done specifically to comprehensively map the park’s vegetation, and files containing sensitive plant monitoring data. Some of the species monitored are the Midget Milk-vetch Plant, the Purple Mountain Parsley Plant, the Pine Foot Plant, the Lupine Plant, etc.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Sequoia Research, 1963-1992
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of sequoia tree studies, surveys, evaluations and correspondence on various topics related to Sequoia trees.
- Arrangement:
-
Arranged by record type .
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of sequoia tree studies, surveys, evaluations and correspondence on various topics related to Sequoia trees.
- Arrangement:
-
Arranged by record type .
Hazard Tree Mitigation, 1933-2002, bulk 1970-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of general hazard tree correspondence and memoranda and records pertaining to more specific hazard tree mitigation projects. When trees are identified as hazardous to people or property within the park, foresters may decide to cut them down depending on the circumstances.
Cutting down trees in a national park may seem to contradict park values, but in reality it has been a common function of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branches of national parks when trees become hazardous to people and park property. Series III, Hazard Tree Mitigation, documents such occurrences. Within the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park, sequoia trees are no longer cut down. In 1967, the felling by the park service of a sequoia tree threatening concession housing in Giant Forest was a major factor in the movement towards the restoration of Giant Forest and the relocation of concessions and overnight lodging. Instead of cutting down sequoias, as happened in 1950 and 1967, now people and property are moved instead. But in cases of non-Sequoia trees becoming hazardous to people and park property, they may be monitored or cut down by tree crews.
Of note, there are also related materials within Series 11 of the Central Files 1935 – 2001 collection. Tom Warner pulled records from the central files for his purposes as park forester. Some of these files predate Tom Warner’s work in the park. They have been returned to the central files and can be found there.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into two subseries: Subseries A, Correspondence and Memoranda; and Subseries B, Projects.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of general hazard tree correspondence and memoranda and records pertaining to more specific hazard tree mitigation projects. When trees are identified as hazardous to people or property within the park, foresters may decide to cut them down depending on the circumstances.
Cutting down trees in a national park may seem to contradict park values, but in reality it has been a common function of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branches of national parks when trees become hazardous to people and park property. Series III, Hazard Tree Mitigation, documents such occurrences. Within the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park, sequoia trees are no longer cut down. In 1967, the felling by the park service of a sequoia tree threatening concession housing in Giant Forest was a major factor in the movement towards the restoration of Giant Forest and the relocation of concessions and overnight lodging. Instead of cutting down sequoias, as happened in 1950 and 1967, now people and property are moved instead. But in cases of non-Sequoia trees becoming hazardous to people and park property, they may be monitored or cut down by tree crews.
Of note, there are also related materials within Series 11 of the Central Files 1935 – 2001 collection. Tom Warner pulled records from the central files for his purposes as park forester. Some of these files predate Tom Warner’s work in the park. They have been returned to the central files and can be found there.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into two subseries: Subseries A, Correspondence and Memoranda; and Subseries B, Projects.
Correspondence and Memoranda, 1933-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The first section of the subseries consists of correspondence, memoranda, planning documents, reports, field notes, data, reviews and evaluations. Tom Warner kept all these different forms of records together, typically separated only by year, not by record type. For this reason, they are gathered here in the general correspondence and memoranda section of the hazard tree series. The second section of files contains documents that define hazard trees. They pertain to the hazard tree rating system, which describes the characteristics that designate a hazard tree. The rating system also determines how dangerous these trees might be on a scale.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries begins with general correspondence and memoranda and follows with records pertaining to the hazard tree rating system. Both are arranged chronologically within their own section.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The first section of the subseries consists of correspondence, memoranda, planning documents, reports, field notes, data, reviews and evaluations. Tom Warner kept all these different forms of records together, typically separated only by year, not by record type. For this reason, they are gathered here in the general correspondence and memoranda section of the hazard tree series. The second section of files contains documents that define hazard trees. They pertain to the hazard tree rating system, which describes the characteristics that designate a hazard tree. The rating system also determines how dangerous these trees might be on a scale.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries begins with general correspondence and memoranda and follows with records pertaining to the hazard tree rating system. Both are arranged chronologically within their own section.
Projects, 1962-2002, bulk 1970-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of records pertaining to specific hazard tree mitigation projects throughout Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The locations of the projects include: Buckeye housing, Cedar Grove, Dorst campground, Generals Highway, Giant Forest, Grant Grove, and Mineral King.
- Arrangement:
-
Projects are arranged alphabetically by geographic location. The files about hazard trees located on Generals Highway are organized numerically by road unit.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of records pertaining to specific hazard tree mitigation projects throughout Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The locations of the projects include: Buckeye housing, Cedar Grove, Dorst campground, Generals Highway, Giant Forest, Grant Grove, and Mineral King.
- Arrangement:
-
Projects are arranged alphabetically by geographic location. The files about hazard trees located on Generals Highway are organized numerically by road unit.
Forest Health, 1929-2005, bulk 1949-1992
- Scope and content:
-
In 1927, the park service joined the Forest Protection Board (FPB), an interagency organization that promoted cooperative fire suppression. The FPB also helped plan the fight of forest diseases and pest infestations. The Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Plant Industry had the main task of supporting the park service in disease control. The early 1930s ushered in major scientific studies on forest health, primarily on insect control techniques, such as with the bark beetle, and blister rust control techniques. White pine blister rust, a non-native fungus, was a primary concern at the time. The endeavors of these allied organizations led to widespread control efforts in the 1930s. Programs to eliminate blister rust based on the results of studies from the early 1930s began in earnest in 1938. Blister rust also lives in the genus of plants called ribes, which includes one hundred and fifty different species. The primary technique of blister rust control was to eliminate any species of ribes. These plants are native and given the large number of species included in this genus, there were a lot of them within the parks. Efforts to eliminate them were difficult and time consuming. Eventually the efforts were given up in the 1950s when they proved futile. The primary program to eliminate dwarf mistletoe infestations occurred in Cedar Grove. This program was primarily a local initiative. The strategy was to prune trees’ limbs carrying mistletoe. They attempted to invigorate the vegetation in Cedar Grove by eliminating this forest pest. The program eventually ceased to be a priority. The year 1941 marked the first major efforts by the park service towards eliminating forest pests. Foresters used chemical sprays and felled trees infested with insects, often by peeling the bark and burning them. The park service primarily focused its efforts on areas important to visitors. It was often a cooperative mission among all public lands, of which the park service’s forestry office was more than willing to participate in. The publication of the Leopold Report in 1963 discontinued the spraying of insecticide in attempts to eradicate forest pests and diseases. The report raised questions about the negative consequences of spraying harsh chemicals to the forests’ delicate ecosystems. These consequences could be more harmful to the management of the national park’s natural resources than the forest diseases and pests.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is organized into four subseries: Subseries A, Program Project Proposals and Accomplishments; Subseries B, Forest Pest Control; Subseries C, Blister Rust Control; and Subseries D, Dwarf Mistletoe Control.
The series consists of records documenting issues associated with forest health. The first subseries includes records relating to all of the forest health issues. For this reason, they are not separated into separate topics but organized into their own section of program project proposals and accomplishments. The second subseries documents forest pest control, primarily insects that cause damage to native plants within the park. The third subseries documents the control of white pine blister rust outbreaks. The final subseries includes records regarding the management of dwarf mistletoe infestations.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
In 1927, the park service joined the Forest Protection Board (FPB), an interagency organization that promoted cooperative fire suppression. The FPB also helped plan the fight of forest diseases and pest infestations. The Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Plant Industry had the main task of supporting the park service in disease control. The early 1930s ushered in major scientific studies on forest health, primarily on insect control techniques, such as with the bark beetle, and blister rust control techniques. White pine blister rust, a non-native fungus, was a primary concern at the time. The endeavors of these allied organizations led to widespread control efforts in the 1930s. Programs to eliminate blister rust based on the results of studies from the early 1930s began in earnest in 1938. Blister rust also lives in the genus of plants called ribes, which includes one hundred and fifty different species. The primary technique of blister rust control was to eliminate any species of ribes. These plants are native and given the large number of species included in this genus, there were a lot of them within the parks. Efforts to eliminate them were difficult and time consuming. Eventually the efforts were given up in the 1950s when they proved futile. The primary program to eliminate dwarf mistletoe infestations occurred in Cedar Grove. This program was primarily a local initiative. The strategy was to prune trees’ limbs carrying mistletoe. They attempted to invigorate the vegetation in Cedar Grove by eliminating this forest pest. The program eventually ceased to be a priority. The year 1941 marked the first major efforts by the park service towards eliminating forest pests. Foresters used chemical sprays and felled trees infested with insects, often by peeling the bark and burning them. The park service primarily focused its efforts on areas important to visitors. It was often a cooperative mission among all public lands, of which the park service’s forestry office was more than willing to participate in. The publication of the Leopold Report in 1963 discontinued the spraying of insecticide in attempts to eradicate forest pests and diseases. The report raised questions about the negative consequences of spraying harsh chemicals to the forests’ delicate ecosystems. These consequences could be more harmful to the management of the national park’s natural resources than the forest diseases and pests.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is organized into four subseries: Subseries A, Program Project Proposals and Accomplishments; Subseries B, Forest Pest Control; Subseries C, Blister Rust Control; and Subseries D, Dwarf Mistletoe Control.
The series consists of records documenting issues associated with forest health. The first subseries includes records relating to all of the forest health issues. For this reason, they are not separated into separate topics but organized into their own section of program project proposals and accomplishments. The second subseries documents forest pest control, primarily insects that cause damage to native plants within the park. The third subseries documents the control of white pine blister rust outbreaks. The final subseries includes records regarding the management of dwarf mistletoe infestations.
Program Project Proposals and Accomplishments, 1959-1991, bulk 1959-1984
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains materials regarding major forest health concerns, such as issues with forest pests, white pine blister rust, and dwarf mistletoe. The materials included are program project proposals, accomplishments, expenditures, summaries, pesticide use reports, funding reports, and correspondence. The folders address multiple forest health issues and thus are not separated into respective categories like the rest of Series IV.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains materials regarding major forest health concerns, such as issues with forest pests, white pine blister rust, and dwarf mistletoe. The materials included are program project proposals, accomplishments, expenditures, summaries, pesticide use reports, funding reports, and correspondence. The folders address multiple forest health issues and thus are not separated into respective categories like the rest of Series IV.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Forest Pest Control, 1929-1998, bulk 1970-1998
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of three main sections. The first section contains correspondence, programs, reports, proposals, data, inventories, bulletins, and a few publications documenting forest pest control. The second section contains reports, updates, correspondence, and articles regarding bark beetle, gypsy moth, and tussock moth infestations. And finally there is a section of field data. This includes scouting data sheets and maps from Cedar Grove, the Devil’s Postpile National Monument, Generals Highway, Giant Forest, Grant Grove, and Lodgepole.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries is organized into three sections: correspondence, insect pests and field data. The first is arranged chronologically. The second section is arranged alphabetically by pest. The final section of field data is arranged alphabetically by geographic location.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of three main sections. The first section contains correspondence, programs, reports, proposals, data, inventories, bulletins, and a few publications documenting forest pest control. The second section contains reports, updates, correspondence, and articles regarding bark beetle, gypsy moth, and tussock moth infestations. And finally there is a section of field data. This includes scouting data sheets and maps from Cedar Grove, the Devil’s Postpile National Monument, Generals Highway, Giant Forest, Grant Grove, and Lodgepole.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries is organized into three sections: correspondence, insect pests and field data. The first is arranged chronologically. The second section is arranged alphabetically by pest. The final section of field data is arranged alphabetically by geographic location.
Blister Rust Control, 1937-2005, bulk 1949-1977
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains two sections. The first section, of only 6 folders, contains blister rust control and maintenance training aids, handbooks, articles, and leaflets. The second section contains blister rust control annual statistical summaries, project plans and proposals, scouting contracts, reports, accomplishments, expenditures, infection center maps, correspondence, field notebooks, surveys, and field notes. The second section has a run of folders titled “Blister Rust Control,” followed by a 3-part number. These are treated differently in their arrangement because in their case the 3-part number representing location is what distinguishes them, not their date. This 3-part number indicates their location: township, range, and section. This Public Land Survey System was the geographic system that predated longitude and latitude.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries is organized into two sections: manuals and reference and field data and reports. The manuals and reference materials (6 folders) are arranged chronologically. The field data and reports are primarily arranged chronologically. The only exception is the large section of folders titled “Blister Rust Control,” followed by a 3-part number. These folders are from around the same years and are instead arranged by the 3-part number. The rest are arranged chronologically.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains two sections. The first section, of only 6 folders, contains blister rust control and maintenance training aids, handbooks, articles, and leaflets. The second section contains blister rust control annual statistical summaries, project plans and proposals, scouting contracts, reports, accomplishments, expenditures, infection center maps, correspondence, field notebooks, surveys, and field notes. The second section has a run of folders titled “Blister Rust Control,” followed by a 3-part number. These are treated differently in their arrangement because in their case the 3-part number representing location is what distinguishes them, not their date. This 3-part number indicates their location: township, range, and section. This Public Land Survey System was the geographic system that predated longitude and latitude.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries is organized into two sections: manuals and reference and field data and reports. The manuals and reference materials (6 folders) are arranged chronologically. The field data and reports are primarily arranged chronologically. The only exception is the large section of folders titled “Blister Rust Control,” followed by a 3-part number. These folders are from around the same years and are instead arranged by the 3-part number. The rest are arranged chronologically.
Dwarf Mistletoe Control, 1930-2002, bulk 1981-1992
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries documents the projects attempting to control dwarf mistletoe outbreaks throughout Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The types of materials included are studies, memos, project proposals, symposium proceedings, data sheets, surveys, rating systems, reports, evaluations, summary reports, field maps, slides, photo logs, plans, management programs, guidelines, correspondence, field notes, and funding requests.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries documents the projects attempting to control dwarf mistletoe outbreaks throughout Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The types of materials included are studies, memos, project proposals, symposium proceedings, data sheets, surveys, rating systems, reports, evaluations, summary reports, field maps, slides, photo logs, plans, management programs, guidelines, correspondence, field notes, and funding requests.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Timber Sales, 1976-2002, bulk 1984-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of records regarding timber sales within the park. There are both general protocols for the sale of timber and documentation of specific timber sale projects.
Before the establishment of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park, logging often took place, as the area was seen as a bountiful place to harvest lumber. Nowadays, it is not normal practice for the park to sell its timber. Only under certain circumstances does the timber from the park become available for sale. Commercial logging has never been allowed within the park because it causes harm to the forest’s health and composition, and goes against the park’s purpose. Even trees that are removed for safety are not sold, simply because the sheer amount of trees deemed hazard trees is not enough to warrant a contractor. Only under extreme circumstances during the park’s history has it been necessary to enter a contract, such as the devastating tussock moth outbreaks or large restoration efforts.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into two subseries: Subseries A, General Protocols; and Subseries B, Projects.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of records regarding timber sales within the park. There are both general protocols for the sale of timber and documentation of specific timber sale projects.
Before the establishment of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park, logging often took place, as the area was seen as a bountiful place to harvest lumber. Nowadays, it is not normal practice for the park to sell its timber. Only under certain circumstances does the timber from the park become available for sale. Commercial logging has never been allowed within the park because it causes harm to the forest’s health and composition, and goes against the park’s purpose. Even trees that are removed for safety are not sold, simply because the sheer amount of trees deemed hazard trees is not enough to warrant a contractor. Only under extreme circumstances during the park’s history has it been necessary to enter a contract, such as the devastating tussock moth outbreaks or large restoration efforts.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into two subseries: Subseries A, General Protocols; and Subseries B, Projects.
General Protocols, 1982-2001
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of timber appraisal handbooks, guidelines, photo logs, harvesting plans, hazard surveillance, government property sales, field notes, correspondence, and floppy disks. These general records relate to all aspects of timber sales within the park; they do not focus on specific projects.
- Arrangement:
-
Arranged chronologically. The only exception being the three folders at the front, which are not strictly in chronological order. They are kept together because they are sections of a 3-part handbook.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of timber appraisal handbooks, guidelines, photo logs, harvesting plans, hazard surveillance, government property sales, field notes, correspondence, and floppy disks. These general records relate to all aspects of timber sales within the park; they do not focus on specific projects.
- Arrangement:
-
Arranged chronologically. The only exception being the three folders at the front, which are not strictly in chronological order. They are kept together because they are sections of a 3-part handbook.
Projects, 1979-2002, bulk 1984-2002
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of more specific timber sale projects. The record types include: contracts, field notes, surveys, appraisal reports, data, proposals, predevelopment monitoring, correspondence, slash burn monitoring, summaries, sale area maps, observations, memoranda, and studies. The projects referenced in these records are Cedar Grove, Clover Creek, Dorst Creek campground, Grant Grove, and Wuksachi.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of more specific timber sale projects. The record types include: contracts, field notes, surveys, appraisal reports, data, proposals, predevelopment monitoring, correspondence, slash burn monitoring, summaries, sale area maps, observations, memoranda, and studies. The projects referenced in these records are Cedar Grove, Clover Creek, Dorst Creek campground, Grant Grove, and Wuksachi.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Meadow Preservation, 1948-1991, bulk 1967-1989
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of general correspondence and records specific to particular projects associated with meadow preservation. These records document use that may have affected meadow preservation, and most importantly, the park service’s efforts towards the continued preservation of meadows within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The documentation of soil and moisture control, snow surveys, forestry and range conservation, and fences and gates, play important roles in the continued preservation of meadows.
The park’s meadows are an important natural resource and this collection contains a substantial amount of material documenting both the use of these meadows as well as their continued preservation. Soil and moisture control was a backcountry program that attempted to correct trail erosion and protect the park’s meadows. One technique to preserve meadows was cutting down pine saplings encroaching on the meadows. An important factor regarding the use of meadows was the prevalence of livestock grazing within the parks. Livestock grazing of the area that would later become Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park began in the 1850s and 1860s. For a substantial amount of time grazing of livestock was allowed, even after its establishment as a national park in support of concessioner’s activities, or in the case of Kings Canyon, the grandfathering of previous forest service area permits for a limited number of years. The Organic Act authorized livestock grazing, but Secretary Lane’s policy letter defined more specific regulations. The policy letter declared that sheep would not be allowed to graze in the parks and cattle were only allowed to graze in areas not typically visited by the public. The park service’s management of meadows began as a result of Lowell Sumner, a biologist, joining the park staff and evidence of swiftly increasing use of the park’s backcountry. Sumner conducted investigations of the effects of livestock grazing on the backcountry and recommended that some areas be closed to stock use. Records of fences built to keep livestock out of certain areas within the park are also important to the preservation of meadows. Livestock grazing ended in the early 1960s.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into two subseries: Subseries A, General Correspondence; and Subseries B, Projects.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The series consists of general correspondence and records specific to particular projects associated with meadow preservation. These records document use that may have affected meadow preservation, and most importantly, the park service’s efforts towards the continued preservation of meadows within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park. The documentation of soil and moisture control, snow surveys, forestry and range conservation, and fences and gates, play important roles in the continued preservation of meadows.
The park’s meadows are an important natural resource and this collection contains a substantial amount of material documenting both the use of these meadows as well as their continued preservation. Soil and moisture control was a backcountry program that attempted to correct trail erosion and protect the park’s meadows. One technique to preserve meadows was cutting down pine saplings encroaching on the meadows. An important factor regarding the use of meadows was the prevalence of livestock grazing within the parks. Livestock grazing of the area that would later become Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park began in the 1850s and 1860s. For a substantial amount of time grazing of livestock was allowed, even after its establishment as a national park in support of concessioner’s activities, or in the case of Kings Canyon, the grandfathering of previous forest service area permits for a limited number of years. The Organic Act authorized livestock grazing, but Secretary Lane’s policy letter defined more specific regulations. The policy letter declared that sheep would not be allowed to graze in the parks and cattle were only allowed to graze in areas not typically visited by the public. The park service’s management of meadows began as a result of Lowell Sumner, a biologist, joining the park staff and evidence of swiftly increasing use of the park’s backcountry. Sumner conducted investigations of the effects of livestock grazing on the backcountry and recommended that some areas be closed to stock use. Records of fences built to keep livestock out of certain areas within the park are also important to the preservation of meadows. Livestock grazing ended in the early 1960s.
- Arrangement:
-
Organized into two subseries: Subseries A, General Correspondence; and Subseries B, Projects.
General Correspondence, 1954-1983
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of general correspondence, reports, and photos regarding meadow preservation.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of general correspondence, reports, and photos regarding meadow preservation.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Projects, 1948-1991
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of materials regarding specific meadow preservation projects. The types of records included are: photos, outlines, annotated maps, fence and gate specifications, project notes, work records, diagrams, descriptions, funding documentation, accomplishments, and memoranda.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries consists of materials regarding specific meadow preservation projects. The types of records included are: photos, outlines, annotated maps, fence and gate specifications, project notes, work records, diagrams, descriptions, funding documentation, accomplishments, and memoranda.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Photographs, Negatives, Slides, and Aerial Photos, 1897-1997, bulk 1963-1988
- Scope and content:
-
The series contains most of the visual documentation of the functions and activities of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch. Many of the slides, photographs, and negatives have been funneled out of their respective series placed into their own subseries within Series VII. Some of the visual material has been dated and titled, but most of it is unlabeled.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is comprised of subseries that parallels the organization of the entire collection, with two additional subjects at the end. It is organized into seven subseries: Subseries A, Vegetation Management; Subseries B, Hazard Tree Mitigation; Subseries C, Forest Health; Subseries D, Timber Sales; Subseries E, Meadow Preservation; Subseries F, Camera Points; and Subseries G, Aerial photos.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The series contains most of the visual documentation of the functions and activities of the Forestry and Vegetation Management Branch. Many of the slides, photographs, and negatives have been funneled out of their respective series placed into their own subseries within Series VII. Some of the visual material has been dated and titled, but most of it is unlabeled.
- Arrangement:
-
The series is comprised of subseries that parallels the organization of the entire collection, with two additional subjects at the end. It is organized into seven subseries: Subseries A, Vegetation Management; Subseries B, Hazard Tree Mitigation; Subseries C, Forest Health; Subseries D, Timber Sales; Subseries E, Meadow Preservation; Subseries F, Camera Points; and Subseries G, Aerial photos.
Vegetation Management, 1965-1986
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains imagery that focuses on vegetation and revegetation projects. Subjects include: prescribed burns, revegetation sites, and general forestry. The media of the subseries includes negatives, photographs, and slides. Field notes for the meadow and well study are also included in the subseries.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains imagery that focuses on vegetation and revegetation projects. Subjects include: prescribed burns, revegetation sites, and general forestry. The media of the subseries includes negatives, photographs, and slides. Field notes for the meadow and well study are also included in the subseries.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Hazard Tree Mitigation, 1964-1997
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains imagery that focuses on hazard trees: including the identification, removal, and the impacts of the trees’ removal. The subseries consists of photographs, negatives, and numerous packets of slides. Other topics present are photographs of specific areas and projects: such as visuals of tree safety, hazard mitigation, and program strategies.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains imagery that focuses on hazard trees: including the identification, removal, and the impacts of the trees’ removal. The subseries consists of photographs, negatives, and numerous packets of slides. Other topics present are photographs of specific areas and projects: such as visuals of tree safety, hazard mitigation, and program strategies.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Forest Health, 1953-1988
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains imagery that pertains to research on forest health projects that were taking place during the time. The subseries is comprised of packets of photographs and negatives—many with dates and locations.
- Arrangement:
-
Organization is project based: with images from the dwarf mistletoe mitigation projects, followed by forest pest control projects, and ending with slides from the blister rust control programs.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
The subseries contains imagery that pertains to research on forest health projects that were taking place during the time. The subseries is comprised of packets of photographs and negatives—many with dates and locations.
- Arrangement:
-
Organization is project based: with images from the dwarf mistletoe mitigation projects, followed by forest pest control projects, and ending with slides from the blister rust control programs.
Timber Sales, no date
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries is comprised of a single un-dated file that holds one movie. It is a VHS of the Grant Grove timber sale.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries is comprised of a single un-dated file that holds one movie. It is a VHS of the Grant Grove timber sale.
Meadow Preservation, 1956-1973
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains imagery of research that focused on soil and moisture. The subseries contains mostly photos and slides. Many of the images have locations and dates.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains imagery of research that focused on soil and moisture. The subseries contains mostly photos and slides. Many of the images have locations and dates.
- Arrangement:
-
Chronological.
Camera Points, 1897-1979
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains permanent camera points, volumes one through three, of Cedar Grove in 1967. The focus is on the landscape and flora, and their change over time. In addition, one of the folders contains images from Dr. Hartesveldt’s south study.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries starts with folders that are more descriptive and leads to general Cedar Grove camera points organized by volume.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains permanent camera points, volumes one through three, of Cedar Grove in 1967. The focus is on the landscape and flora, and their change over time. In addition, one of the folders contains images from Dr. Hartesveldt’s south study.
- Arrangement:
-
The subseries starts with folders that are more descriptive and leads to general Cedar Grove camera points organized by volume.
Aerial Photos, no date
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains three rolls of aerial photographs. Each reel has been labeled with a location. The rolls have been placed in enclosures designed to keep them safe. Locations include: Inyo Forest areas, south of Hume Lake District, and Inyo National Forest.
Collection context
Background
- Scope and content:
-
This subseries contains three rolls of aerial photographs. Each reel has been labeled with a location. The rolls have been placed in enclosures designed to keep them safe. Locations include: Inyo Forest areas, south of Hume Lake District, and Inyo National Forest.